Sprint Retrospective

Sprint Retrospective is to plan ways to increase quality and effectiveness. It is an opportunity for teams to reflect on their journey, refine their processes, and set the stage for continuous improvement. This blog unravels the significance of the Sprint Retrospective, exploring its purpose, key practices, and the transformative impact it can have on team dynamics.

To conduct a successful sprint retrospective, follow these steps:

  1. Set the Stage: Create a comfortable and conducive environment for open discussion and collaboration. Ensure all team members are present and actively engaged.
  2. Establish Ground Rules: Establish ground rules to maintain a respectful and productive environment. Encourage active listening, participation, and a focus on improvement, not blame.
  3. Gather Data: Collect feedback from team members about the sprint’s successes, challenges, and areas for improvement. Use various techniques like sticky notes, whiteboard brainstorming, or anonymous surveys to gather diverse perspectives. The team typically discusses:
    • How well the team members interact and communicate.
    • Any impediments they’ve encountered.
    • How well impediments were removed.
    • If the Definition of Done still serves them as written, or if it needs to be updated.
    • If there are any improvements to how the team works that can be implemented in future Sprints.
  4. Analyze and Prioritize: Analyze the gathered feedback to identify recurring themes, common pain points, and areas for significant improvement. Prioritize these issues based on their impact and potential for positive change.
  5. Generate Actionable Ideas: Brainstorm and generate actionable ideas to address the prioritized issues. Encourage creative thinking and consider solutions from various team members’ perspectives.
  6. Establish Action Items: Select specific action items with clear ownership and deadlines. Ensure the action items are measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound (SMART goals).
  7. Document and Communicate: Document the key takeaways, action items, and decisions made during the retrospective. Share the documentation with the entire team for transparency and accountability.
  • If the team’s conversation is tangential – you can help realign focus with some of the following prompts:
    • What about this is within our control versus outside of our control?
    • How did our behaviors and patterns enable or contribute to this outcome?
    • What might we do differently if we are presented with a similar situation in the future? 
    • Was this a purposeful experiment or a regular practice for us?
    • Is there a potential action item anyone can think of we should capture around this?
  • Few questions to help in generating retrospective items
    • How did we do it? What did we do to make it successful?
    • What helped us do it?
    • Which skills made the difference?
    • How did being part of a team help to realize it?
    • What did team members do to help you?
  • Once you have problem areas below questions will help in avoid in future
    • How can you use your individual or team strengths to solve this problem?
    • What would you do more frequently that would help prevent the problem from happening again?
    • Which actions can you take, which you are already capable of?
  • Define SMART Actions – 
    • S—Specific (Clear Who’s & Who?)
    • M—Measurable (When?)
    • A—Achievable (Reachable?) 
    • R—Relevant (Identifies and Fixes Issues?)
    • T—Time-bound (Deadline?)

ESVP – Explain the categories: Explorer, Shopper, Vacationer & Prisoner. Then ask team members to write down their feelings & keep it anonymous. If there are many in Prisoner category then improvise the meeting and talk about why they feel like a prisoner.

  • Explorer, exciting to be in the retrospective and eager to discover and learn new things. 
  • Shopper, happy to be in the retrospective and open to learning new things. 
  • Vacationer, glad to be away from his desk. 
  • Prisoner, totally doesn’t like the retrospective and it is punishment (s)he needs to be here.

Weather – Ask team members to write down their feelings with respect to weather that represents for them the last iteration. (Sunny or Rainy)

Seasons – Ask people how they felt about the last sprint/iteration. 

  • Winter – It refers to cozy, cold, inside, slow. 
  • Spring – It is related to new growth, fresh, light. 
  • Summer – It refers to happy, hot, outside, cheerful 
  • Autumn – It refers to change, colorful, windy and getting darker.
  • Scrum Team members do not actively participate – When Scrum Team members are passive during a Sprint Retrospective, the Scrum Master will often step in and pull information from the team, or will come up with their own list of areas for improvement
  • Issues are not raised during the Retrospective, but team members grumble about them outside the meeting
  • Participants do not recall issues that came up during the Sprint so the issues are not raised during the Retrospective
  • The team becomes complacent and says that there is nothing they can improve  
  • Lack of honesty and communication – Often because they’d like to minimize conflict or because there is a lack of trust on the team
  • Recurring items, nothing changes – When the same impediments or ineffective team interactions are identified in multiple Sprint Retrospectives, it’s an indicator that nothing is being done to rectify the problems or make improvements
  • Team focuses on items they cannot improve – Some teams spend too much time focused on items that are outside of the team’s domain and influence
  • Participants are told they are “being negative” when they identify items that need to be improved – This generally results in participants being unwilling to make further observations
  • The Sprint Retrospective turns into a “blame game” where the focus is on people rather than the process
  • The team is not comfortable with the Product Owner attending the Sprint Retrospective – Often this happens when the Product Owner acts as though they are a manager of the team, rather than as a team member
  • There is no plan for conducting or facilitating the Sprint Retrospective or it’s  conducted in the same way each time – Participants may find the Retrospective boring, stale, unfocused and a waste of time if they either don’t plan how they will run the Retrospective or they mechanically follow a three question format:
    • What went well? 
    • What was a challenge?
    • What could be improved?

Sprint retrospectives are an invaluable tool for Agile teams to foster continuous improvement, strengthen team collaboration, and adapt to evolving needs. By following the execution steps outlined above and employing effective retrospective techniques, teams can effectively reflect on their performance, identify areas for growth, and establish actionable plans for the future. Remember, effective retrospectives are not about pointing fingers or assigning blame; they are about collectively learning from experiences, embracing challenges as opportunities, and continuously striving to deliver better products and services. Embrace the power of retrospectives and watch your team soar to new heights of success.

Reference:

Making Your Sprint Retrospectives More Effective

Fact based Analysis for Sprint Retrospective

Start Stop and Continue Sprint Retrospective

Glad-Sad-Mad Sprint Retrospective

Starfish Sprint Retrospective

Sailboat Sprint Retrospective

Liked Learned Lacked Longed For (4Ls) Retrospective

Scroll to Top